User:Nomymelon/Sustainable yield/KameronSch Peer Review

General info
Nomymelon
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Nomymelon/Sustainable yield - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Sustainable yield - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
The additional content added to the forestry section is concise and is relevant to the topic. The new content they wrote provides examples that support the previous paragraph which flows with the transition sentence. They may want to add data that expresses how much of the example countries follow sustainable yield forestry and if it is significant. They may also want to explain what exactly entails in Sweden's "intense forest management". The tone is neutral and not biased to any position. The points provided are varied and don't overrepresent any one point in sustainable yield forestry. This article does not address one of Wikipedia's equity gaps and I don't think this topic could have the potential to. The Wikipedia article page is lacking content and could have many more additional subjects other than forestry, fishing and groundwater. The published Wikipedia article could be enhanced by including additional topics to provide a more comprehensive coverage of the subject matter. The claim made in the second sentence of paragraph two must be supported by a source. The content that is cited is backed up by a reliable source that is up to date. The content does also accurately reflect what is stated and are current sources. I could not check source 2, the website could not load the link displayed a message that said "This Springer Nature application is currently unavailable. This could be due to abnormal network traffic or problems with our systems." so, I'm not sure if that is a functioning article/link. There are better sources available to replace source 2 which may be a bit outdated since it is from 1995 and I'm not sure if that article is a peer reviewed publication. The published Wikipedia article contains only one image, so it would benefit from more images being added to improve comprehension of the topic and enhance the page's visual appeal. In general, the content added to this article is well-written and has enriched this topic.