User:Noodlesoup 110033/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Bucky Barnes (Marvel Cinematic Universe)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because Bucky Barnes is my favorite Marvel character. His character development throughout the show and the incredible emotional problems he overcame is very impressive and I think it doesn't get enough recognition. The article was good, there is a lot of information on him and what he has done in the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

Evaluate the article
Lead Section:

The article has a very strong introductory  sentence, and incudes all names and aliases Bucky Barnes goes by. They also include his involvement in the Marvel Universe and the comics.

Although the lead section does include Barnes' involvement throughout the MCU, it does not touch on the section of his character creation or the characterization section involving Sebastian Stan's work to complete the role.

The lead section includes all information included in the article.

The lead section does seem to be overdetailed, it includes important information about Barnes, but includes many smaller details that are explained in other sections.

Content:

The article's consent is very relevant to the topic.

The content does seem to be up-to-date.

There doesn't seem to be any content missing and all of it belongs in the article.

The article is completely fictional and does not represent a real person or situation.

Tone and Balance:

The article is very neutral and includes neutral facts about the character.

There are no claims or biases in the article.

There are no viewpoints in particular that sway a specific way compared to the others.

The article does not try to persuade the reader a specific way.

Sources and References:

Not all sources are backed by a reliable source. Some come from very opinionated articles or reviews. Even though the information from these sources are non-biased, the sources are.

Most sources are thorough, but some are generalized and only offer a brief or vague description of the information included in the article from the source.

The sources are current.

The sources differ from websites to creators of the character.

There are better sources available for certain citations, regarding the neutral aspect of a source compared to a biased version.

All links that I have checked work and bring me to the correct place.

Organization and Writing Quality:

The article is well written. The information presented is clear and it is easy for people to read and understand all information.

There doesn't seem to be any spelling or grammatical errors throughout the article.

The article is well organized, it explains the timeline of the character very well.

Images and Media:

There is only one image, and it includes a picture of the character in a film.

The image is well captioned, including the actor and character's names and the movie it was from.

The only image is at the top of the article, allowing the reader to see the character they are about to read about.

Talk Page Discussion:

There is no talk page for this article.

The article is rated C-Class and included in many WikiProjects including WikiProject Film / Comic book / Marvel Cinematic Universe, WikiProject Television / Marvel Cinematic Universe,  WikiProject Comics / Marvel, WikiProject Fictional characters.

Overall Impressions:

The article is rated as C-Class and as low-importance.

The article covers all events in the character's life, all of his appearances in movies or television, and goes in detail to explain the events.

The mean section of the article is a little too detailed. This information could be shortened, as it is explained in better detail in the different sections of the article.

The article is very completed and up to date on the character, it doesn't seem to be missing any important information.