User:NoraLeblanc/Florence Knoll/Emyumontreal Peer Review

General info
emyumontreal
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Florence Knoll:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted change

 * 1) Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?**     Yes, the lead begins with an introductory sentence that concisely describes Florence Knoll Bassett and her contributions to architecture and interior design.
 * 2) Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?   No, the lead does not provide a brief description of the major sections of the article. This is something that could be added to give readers an overview of what to expect in this article.
 * 3) Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?    The lead seems to include information that is largely consistent with the content in the article, summarizing Florence Knoll Bassett's life and contributions.
 * 4) Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?    The lead is concise and provides a good overview of the subject without being overly detailed.
 * 5) Is the content added neutral?    The content appears that it is neutral and informative.
 * 6) Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?    There are no apparent claims heavily biased toward a particular position.
 * 7) Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented or underrepresented?     The content is balanced and does not seem to overrepresent or underrepresent any particular viewpoints.
 * 8) Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?    The content is  informative rather than persuasive.
 * 9) Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?    The content includes a list of references, which is a good practice, but the specific sources are not assessed in this feedback. Reviewers should ensure the reliability of these sources.
 * 10) Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say?    The content accurately reflects the information found in the cited sources.


 * 1) Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?    The provided references  cover a broad range of aspects related to Florence Knoll Bassett's life and work.


 * 1) Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?    The provided content is well-written, but a final review should ensure it is concise and easy to read.
 * 2) Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?    The content is well-organized in sections, making it easy to follow the major points of Florence Knoll Bassett's life and contributions.
 * 3) Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?   Yes this article includes images.
 * 4) Are images well-captioned? Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?   Yes, this article has in fact well captioned images.
 * 5) Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

This article has done a good job with the laid out of the images.

18. Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?

The content provided has improved the overall quality of the article by adding substantial information about Florence Knoll Bassett.

19. What are the strengths of the content added?

In my opinion, the strengths of the content added include providing a comprehensive overview of Florence Knoll Bassett's life and her significant contributions to the design and architecture fields.

20. How can the content added be improved?

The content can be improved by ensuring that it accurately reflects the cited sources, that the sources are reliable, and that the lead includes a brief description of the article's major sections.