User:Noraft/Essays/Mediation

Mediation Assumptions
Everyone brings assumptions with them into a mediation, including the mediator. For example, we all assume mediation will only be possible if all parties are willing to discuss their positions; thus, communication is an inherent assumption.

I'd like to identify some of the assumptions I bring to mediation.

Terms are Descriptive, not Prescriptive
Terms, as used in Wikipedia article space, are descriptive, not prescriptive. As Jorge Luis Borges says in the prologue to "El otro, el mismo": "It is often forgotten that [dictionaries] are artificial repositories, put together well after the languages they define." This is in opposition to "traditionalists" who wish to prescribe use of a particular term, because newly emerging usage is different than the original usage. If 100,000 people now describe what was once traditionally called a widget as a thermal widget (because they also identify acoustic widgets and electromagnetic widgets), and that "widget" is an umbrella term for them all, then that's what Wikipedia should record, even if the new types of widget aren't built the same way, made of the same materials, or even have the same function. Someone typing "widget" into the search function should be directed to a page that both describes the different types of things people call widget and helps one quickly navigate to the content of one's choosing.

Mediators Invested in Helping Parties Communicate
Mediators do not tell people what to do. They make suggestions. If a mediator cites an essay or a guideline, that is to suggest that observance of said essay or guideline may aid in communication and/or understanding. A good mediator has only one vested interest: in helping the parties communicate.