User:NorthShoreLoon/Columbia College Chicago/Asegura01 Peer Review

General info
NorthShoreLoon
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:NorthShoreLoon/Columbia College Chicago
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Columbia College Chicago
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Columbia College Chicago
 * Columbia College Chicago

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Peer review

Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects:

Lead
The lead is in depth as it talks about the history and the origins of the school.

Content
The content of strike is all relevant and concise as it explains what the strike was about. What I would suggest is to be careful using quotes and possibly rewriting the information in your own words. Sometimes this will be considered plagiarism, hence finding a way to simplify or put it in your own words will be easier. If there is a citation it is from make sure to include it since it is a Wikipedia page.

Tone and Balance
The tone and balance of the article are neutral. Sometimes it is difficult to be neutral but I think the writer did a great job of being straightforward and not being biased as they present the information.

Sources and References
The links the author added were all accessible which is important.

Organization
I think the organization could be enhanced by adding a title to this short paragraph. This is important to place maybe somewhere after the discussion of the institution. I would suggest it maybe after the Environmental record.

Images and Media
If the author wants to add media I would suggest one they can find on the website Wikipedia suggests in the training module about media. I do not think the article needs media images, but if the author wants to show what the strike looked like it could help the audience understand how the strike looked.

For New Articles Only
Not a new article just a paragraph.

Overall impressions
I think this section adds more depth to the article as it talks about the strike. Sometimes people may shy away from it but I think this is important to talk about, hence this section does a great job of highlighting what the strike is about.