User:North Atlanticist Usonian/Archive 3

You've got a response at the Teahouse!
18:44, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Pass some more methods
What does it mean?!?!?!? MezzoMezzo (talk) 10:02, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Its a synthesis of two meanings. Firstly it indicates i want wikipedia articles to be A class (i.e. good) hence "pass A". Secondly, it stems from a lyric in a song i like from Wu Tang Clan - "i smell sess, pass the method". Pass a Method   talk  10:11, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

July 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Syrian civil war infobox, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Sopher99 (talk) 12:48, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

July 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=563212542 your edit] to Father may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:09, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
 * A father (or dad) is a male [parent|] who has raised a child, supplied the sperm which grew into a child, and/or donated a body

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=563390347 your edit] to Order of the Solar Temple may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:03, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
 * and other countries. The Temple's activities were a mix of early Protestant Christianity, UFO religion  and New Age philosophy using variously adapted Freemason rituals.  Jouret was interested

Urantia
I once understood this to be a UFO religion, but I can't find a reliable source that says it is. Dougweller (talk) 05:20, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
 * And thanks for the barnstar. I should add that I was in a discussion last week at Talk:Ancient Astronauts where I was probably the one that added Urantia as a UFO religion, but went back and checked my source and realised that although Urantia was discussed in a book on UFO religions, it didn't seem to be called one. My bad there. Dougweller (talk) 20:42, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abu Musallam attack, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rock and Stick (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

User talk:Sopher99
Leave Sopher99's talk page alone. If you want to comment at WP:AN, fine, although I'm not convinced it helps you, but he has a right to remove your comments from his talk page.--Bbb23 (talk) 03:34, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

FGM
Sorry to nag, but I noticed this and while I never studied their jurisprudence formally, this is the first time I've heard that. With the exception of a few nutbags who get media attention, pretty much all clerics at Azhar (Egypt is atl east half Shafi'i) seem to be against FGM, and Indonesia (almost entirely Shafi'i) doesn't have the FGM problems northeast Africa does. That being said, you have brought a print source. Is it on Google Books? Do you have ISBN info? I would really like to take a look at in, in addition to perhaps perusing through the FGM article and what modern Shafi'ite clerics are saying about it, as I was surprised by the info. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:36, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
 * To be specific, I had Religious_views_on_female_genital_mutilation in mind. I think it's sweeping aside quite a bit of nuance and discussion to state that any of the schools of law obligate or recommend the practice. I can say from experience that most medieval Hanbali manuals of jurisprudence never address the issue at all; in fact it's difficult to find much material prior to 200 or so years ago. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:44, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I added some refs, but if you see issues with it just drop me a note. Pass a Method   talk  13:00, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, yeah. I was linking to the above article to show that FGM's status as a religious practice is disputed, so while there are reliable sources which state that the Shafi'i school obligates it, there are also reliable sources which state that the practice is cultural rather than religious. Thus I don't think it's prudent to state in the article that the school absolutely obligates it without a shadow of a doubt. Ali Gomaa in particular rejects the practice rather strongly, and if you're looking for a Shafi'ite jurist today there aren't many as respected as him. I would suggest making it clear that the view has been attributed to the school, though this attribution is disputed.
 * Also as an aside, this source specifically refers to male circumcision, not FGM, so I don't think it really verifies the current content in the article. MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:03, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, btw, if seeing my comments every few days is becoming an irritant. I'm just trying to make sure everybody's voice is heard, though I understand that sometimes my messages can cause annoyance. MezzoMezzo (talk) 09:34, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Its cool. Irritation is part and parcel of life lol. Pass a Method   talk  09:47, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Can u till me what is my mistake ?
I have created a page based on Arabic sources and translated them there is no English sources, what is the problem?3bdulelah (talk) 21:59, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

I have seen articles with sources of different langues. If u can't read Arabic u can use Google translate and u will find out that
 * Ghuraba al-Sham Front is the group Active in syria
 * Ghuraba al-Sham or what u call "the jihadist Group" doesn't exist anymore after the death of it' leader before the Syrian civl war.
 * Al Qaeda in Iraq = Islamic state of Iraq and the Levant as I explained here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Islamic_State_of_Iraq#Rename_the_article

All these information I know it very well because I always read the News of the war from different Syrian sites while u only read western media sites.

Shukran/thank u — Preceding unsigned comment added by 3bdulelah (talk • contribs) 22:23, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Adam and Eve
"Theres a wikilink"? What are you talking about? I searched (before adding). Not only is there not a link to Bible, the word isn't in the article at all -- and it needs to be. --Musdan77 (talk) 05:03, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

RfA
I've just seen your post. Surely you'd want to post urls for evidence, otherwise it makes it seem like you just have a vendetta.  ceran  thor 01:57, 28 July 2013 (UTC)


 * @Pass a Method, you have an in-depth response on  my  talk  page.
 * @Ceranthor: you may  wish  to  read it  too.
 * Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:04, 28 July 2013 (UTC)


 * @Ceranthor What i posted was all off the top of my head. If i have time i will dig through his edit history. Pass a Method   talk  02:14, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The RfA ends in 2 days, 17 hours. I'm sure some (including me) are willing to change their opinion if you can provide diffs for your allegations.  Mohamed CJ  (talk)  08:52, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

AN
Courtesy and policy  require that  I  let you  know that  a topic in which you are involved is under discussion at Administrators' noticeboard. Please note that it is a request  for clarification  on  policy and/or guidelines, and not  a singular complaint  about  a specific editor. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:56, 28 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Courtesy might require it, but I have stiff doubt it plays any part in your notification above. You should apologize for the "inadvertent typo" on Pass's username you left in editsum here, Kuddung, especially in the context where an editor (Malleus) was recently blocked for calling an editor "asshole". Ihardlythinkso (talk) 14:26, 28 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Unlike some, Ihardlythinkso, I don't  have a nasty  suspicious mind and don't look  for bad faith  in  everything and every  typo every  admin  (or other user, for that  matter) does or says. I've never used a rude word out  of context  in  my  entire editing history - I'm old, conservative, and above playing  such  tedious games. Time for you  to  drop what  has ostensibly become an anti-admin  campaign and get  back  to  your more serious kind of opening gambits.  Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:06, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Even were your typo unintentional, an "excuse the mistake, Pass" would have been appropriate, especially it was made in permanent never-modified editsum. And regarding your unfair, unwarranted, overgeneralized accusations of me, that type of thing is no surprise at all coming from you; my thoughts above are not generalized to anyone but come out of direct observations limited to your editing behavior, often rife with innuendo and laced with snide comment -- you don't need "bad words" for your incivilities you have other ways below the radar via that style. (You can take your repeated ad nauseum "anti-admin brigade", "you have a general antipathy toward admins", and "you paint all admins with a broad brush" untrue overgeneralized insults lobbed at me and other editors and just stuff it, Kudpung.) Ihardlythinkso (talk) 17:11, 28 July 2013 (UTC) p.s. "I've never used a rude word out of context" -- I have no idea what that means (every time you use a rude word it is in context!?). If it's true you pride yourself not using rude words, all the more reason to offer the suggested apology immediately to Pass to correct the record, than not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ihardlythinkso (talk • contribs) 17:32, 28 July 2013‎ (UTC)
 * Unfortunately edit summaries can not be edited. They can, though, be revdel'd, and as an admin User:Kudpung can and should do so. Apteva (talk) 20:42, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pointing out. Apparently "courtesy and policy" don't require him to though, and he prefers to diss *me* (with personal attacks and ad hominems ["nasty suspicious mind", "anti-admin campaign"]) for putting my nose in ("Time for you  to [...] get back to your more serious kind of opening gambits."), instead. Ihardlythinkso (talk) 21:39, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Barnstar
Even though I disagree with your interpretation of the candidate's edits, you have valid points. I am dismayed to see so many editors attacking your opinion. Best wishes. Axl ¤  [Talk]  09:29, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Response
Actually, you are mistaken. I edit once and I reverted also once. One edit, one revert. Coltsfan (talk) 18:41, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Brazilian athlete
There's no hard and fast rule on that; rather, it depends on the situation. If he grew up in Brazil and then emigrated to Britain as an adult, for example, then the Brazilian category could be relevant; if he was born in Brazil to parents who happened to be travelling or temporarily living there at the time, but moved back to Britain at a very young age and thus grew up primarily in Britain, then the Brazilian category might not be warranted. It's kind of a subjective judgement call in many cases, unfortunately. Bearcat (talk) 21:34, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Somalilander
Hi. Note that no such nationality exists. Please also note that Article 8 of the Constitution of Somalia stipulates that "a person who is a Somali citizen cannot be deprived of Somali citizenship, even if they become a citizen of another country" (c.f. ). Regards, Middayexpress (talk) 23:47, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Place of birth
As far as i know BLP violations are pretty serious and i think this edit constitutes a BLP since you are misrepresening his self-desribed affiliation. Consider this a caution. Pass a Method  talk  20:27, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
 * As you are quite well aware since it was explained to you here, Farah was born in Mogadishu. He was not born in Hargeisa or any other town in the northwestern Somaliland region of Somalia, though he does have family from that region. He was also raised in Djibouti. Regards, Middayexpress (talk) 20:32, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I was quoting BLP. I did not mention anything about birthplaces. Pass a Method   talk  20:39, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
 * In the linked discussion above over this same issue (don't play dumb), you claimed that he was from Somaliland. In reality, Farah was born in Mogadishu and spent his childhood in Djibouti. Regards, Middayexpress (talk) 20:44, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

How are you doing
Your back editing wikipedia again? I missed you --Misconceptions2 (talk) 21:35, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Chelsea Manning
Yeah, my mistake. Didn't realize someone was actually going to tally votes haha. IFreedom1212 (talk) 01:38, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

what is the constructive direction?
… to address the level of language on Talk:Abrahamic_religions - specifically. And really - this kind of behavior - look at the summary of at that moment, 06:34, September 9, 2013, when the talk page was like this  and then his other edits on other articles were reverted too at  and  all without a hint of consensus or citation and using the talk page of Abrahamic religions as justification even on the talk pages of those editors. I know we don't "bite the new guy" (and I think my language has tried to support that) wherever that guideline is but this is quiet beyond acceptable, no? --Smkolins (talk) 14:12, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Irreligion in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sam Harris (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Mentioned on the ref desk talk page
I just posted on the ref desk talk page about your recent question. I'm letting you know so you can join the discussion if you like. Wikipedia_talk:Reference_desk K ati e R  (talk) 17:22, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Ebionites 3 arbitration
Pass a Method, the arbitration case involving the Gospel of the Ebionites featured article was accepted as Arbitration/Requests/Case/Ebionites 3. It's too late to make an opening statement, but you may still want to weigh in on the Evidence page or later during the Workshop. You could provide a broader perspective as an editor who is working on improving non-Christian articles. Cheers. Ignocrates (talk) 17:14, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

RE: Warning
What di d I misrepresent? You want to gdo a simple google search of the quoted terms and find it? Please don't threaten others if you don't want to take the effort to verify it.(Lihaas (talk) 02:43, 22 September 2013 (UTC)).

1 revert rule violation
I am not sure whether your aware of it or not, but you broke the 1 revert rule at 17:17

I suggest self-reverting. Sopher99 (talk) 17:51, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

WP:V
Hello Pass a Method, thanks for all your work on Wikipedia. I have been looking at your talk page to get a good feel of your style of interaction with other editors. This is after you reverted my edit that removed your unverifiable content you added at Switchboard operator. Your edit summary makes a good point; I should have added the usual template after your edit. Question: Will you be editing the article today to cite the source you referred to for that content or should I go ahead and mark your edit as unsourced? —Prhartcom (talk) 15:36, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Nice Systemic bias article
By the way, nice job on the Christian POV on Wikipedia article within the WP namespace. I greatly enjoyed reading it, I agree with it, and—probably like you—find it too often in everyday life, not just Wikipedia. Ah well, right? Anyway, I may point someone to this article someday ... although too bad I can't do that in everyday life. Cheers. —Prhartcom (talk) 18:25, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Bradley Manning/October 2013 move request
Greetings. Because you participated in the August 2013 move request regarding this subject, you may be interested in participating in the current discussion. This notice is provided pursuant to Canvassing. Cheers! bd2412 T 21:40, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abu Omar al-Chechen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chechen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=576141622 your edit] to LGBT in Islam may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:25, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * ]. Some hadiths state that prophet Muhammad cursed transgender people. Qur'an 4:16 calls for the punishment of

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=579235472 your edit] to List of people from Minnesota may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:36, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
 * * Faysal Ahmed born 1985  - actor
 * * Kevin McCarthy 1914-2010 - actor

Disambiguation link notification for October 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Irreligion in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freethinker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Prostitution article edit
Hi, I undid | your removal of a big chunk of the Prostitution article. Saying it's "biased" is not enough of an explanation for a mass deletion. I think it needs some tinkering, but an attempt seems to have been made at balance by various editors. If you want to make such a big removal, it should be discussed first on the talk page. Thanks. PhilMacD (talk) 10:32, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
–Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 16:05, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Terror-Free Oil Initiative, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Loomspicker (talk) 21:19, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Stop Islamophobia Week for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stop Islamophobia Week is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Stop Islamophobia Week until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.--Loomspicker (talk) 21:31, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Templates
Experienced editors should not be templated. Dougweller (talk) 05:29, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Ways to improve Intrusiveness
Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Pass a Method, thanks for creating Intrusiveness!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. stub

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 19:49, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Scope and title for Bisexuality in the Arab world
During the recent AfD for Bisexuality in the Arab world (closed as 'keep') you will either have seen opinions expressed to expand the scope of the article, or voiced that opinion yourself. I am placing this notice on the talk pages of all who expressed an opinion of whatever type in that deletion discussion to invite you to participate in a discussion on article scope and title at Talk:Bisexuality in the Arab world. You are cordially invited to participate. By posting this message I am not seeking to influence your opinion one way or another. Fiddle  Faddle  10:28, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=580658959 your edit] to Erotic massage may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:38, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
 * women from Burma, southern China, Laos and Vietnam have been trafficked into Thailand.

Proposed deletion of Amina Ali


The article Amina Ali has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence that she is currently notable. Maybe she will be one day but it's WP:TOSOON for an article on her.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 16:00, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

your edit at Rape
You could go to WP:RSN but I doubt anyone would agree that US official statistics can't be used. That's a reliable source by our criteria. Dougweller (talk) 21:56, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm okay with US stats being used. But not okay with outdated stats being used in the lede/introduction. Pass a Method   talk  22:11, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Flyer22 and your editing
I would attempt to call a truce with you, but I think we both know it would be fake. I can understand why my sister would think you are stalking her. You went from here to here after she made these edits. Plus, you are too often aware of things (even things specific to her) you could only be aware of if keeping up with her edits and/or watching her talk page. You know what it's like to be WP:Stalked. I WP:Stalked you (although my true intention was not to harass). So try not to stalk my sister so much. If you do, then do like you've been doing for several months and generally don't bother her. I know that you are interested in sex topics and have started back up editing them, occasionally so far, but listen: When I stalked you, my intentions were good. WP:HOUND makes an exception for problematic edits. It wasn't me alone expressing concern about your edits. Your archives and some posts you deleted from your talk page prove this. Oftentimes I don't like how you edit articles, especially sex articles, because I don't think you should be editing them if you are going to be editing them with bias. Look at this recent edit you made to our article on prostitution. After PhilMacD reverted you, you buried the material in the section on violence. Thing is, not all human trafficking is categorized as violence. There's a little bias going on with your edits at the article on violence against prostitutes too. These edits caused me to recently email John Carter because he feels the same as I do about a lot of your edits and was thinking about starting a WP:RfC/U on you. He and other editors were very close to helping with and starting that WP:RfC/U. The only reason I won't edit these sex articles is because I'm generally supposed to stay out of my sister's editing space. But I keep a watchful eye on some of the sex articles and other Wiki articles. You want to know why my sister is so respected as far as sex articles are concerned? It's because despite however she may feel about a sexual topic (and, seriously, she's just as supportive of LGBT topics as you are), she edits it with WP:DUE WEIGHT. She likes to spout off about that policy a lot, and the more I watch her edit this site, the more I understand why. Maybe if you consistently edited with WP:DUE WEIGHT, your edits would be better off. Something to think about.

Just so you know, the info you added to the article on parent does not say that three biological parents are possible. It says two. I've been meaning to revert you on that. If you don't fix that edit, I will. Halo Jerk1 (talk) 02:54, 9 November 2013 (UTC)