User:Northhampton1851/sandbox

Arnold W Green Arnold W Green is the authority on Henry Charles Carey. His profound ardent love John Bull led him to shed some new light on Henry Carey. Carey was of the Nationalist School of Political Economy. But no protectionist who wrote books on the subject of protectionism never called themselves nationalists. That name was given to them. Protectionism today is out dated. Applying 19 century methods in a global economy is not democratic, even though it is right. Those who have refuted protectionism have done so defend the John Bull. Bull though a suspect of many war crimes has never been brought to justice. The closest thing to justice that any nation got out of the misunderstood John Bull was in 1871. Supposedly John Bull endeavored to build a navy for the barbarians during a civil war. But back to that ardent admirer of John Bull, Arnold Green. Arnold Green typifies what objective journalism should be ethical and not biased. His book on Carey suggests that protectionism was a futile policy, sadly what evidence do white supremacist give in saying they are superior. Could this be proven by a rigorous scientific method or is it just false assumptions. Green manages to tell the truth on what date Carey was born meaningless. He tells on where his father came from meaningless. He is correct on why Henry Carey added Charles to his name. He is correct in saying that his father admired the womanizer Alexander Hamilton meaningless. Those are just simple facts, and telling them will not be subjected to peer review, and Wikipedia only allows simple facts meaningless information. No protectionist who have entries in that entity educates people, if you call it that, are omitted as protectionist. But back with Arnold Green He fails to be bias in his book on Henry Carey. Not being bias is essentially being the lawyer for John Bull. John Bulls hires lawyers to defend him not to tell the truth about him. Arnold Green though said to be an expert on Henry Carey is a like a black nationalist who claims to know the truth about the intentions of Abraham Lincoln. Reading Green's book on Henry Carey will allow for one to be exempt from actually studying Henry Carey which he clearly did not. Questions have been asked on could a monkey have written this unbiased book on the protectionist Henry Carey. Any animal can quote somebody but can they teach, and the answer is no. What is Green's understanding of protectionism, other wise known as the American System of Political Economy. Were Green to speak about protectionism could he be seen to know of Protectionism, the American System like Robert Ellis Thompson, pupil of Henry Carey, William D Kelley, pupil of Henry Carey, William Elder pupil of Henry Carey, John Byles, Erasmus Peshine Smith, Andrew Young, Van Buren Denslow, George Gunton Edwin Hartshorn, Ellis Henry Roberts, Robert Percival Porter, Thomas Haines Dudley, Henry Hoyt, John L Hayes, William McKinley, James Blaine,Thomas Reed , Nelson Dingley jr, Roscoe Conkling, Otto Von Bismarck, Jean Baptiste Colbert, Friedrich List, Sun Yat Sen, Fukuzawa Yukichi, Count Nesselrode, and George Boughton Curtiss? An encyclopedia may have an entry on these figures, but all must take part in not having John Bull brought to justice. The sources Green uses to ridicule Henry Carey are like witnesses in a kangaroo court. Green is of the opinion that the Cotton Gin is the reason why slavery lasted so long, he is of the opinion that Carey's judgment suggested he was off his rocker when talking about the British, he may have had dementia. The British can not be tried for poisoning Chinese with opium, turning India to a agricultural nation that subjected itself to famines like they did with Ireland, having India grow poppy and then sell that poppy in the form of opium to the Chinese, and blatantly supporting the South in the Civil War. Green is of the opinion that history does not furnish the world with evidence that tariffs are needed. It is a good thing babies were not born reading tabloids. He is also of the opinion that the Democratic party of Jackson and Van Buren did not destroy the credit institution in the United States. The only form of economy that needs credit will have a constitution that conveys that government will imposes duties to provide for the common defense and general welfare, facilitate industry, regulate commerce, support the useful arts and sciences, and that shall borrow credit on behalf of the nation does not need credit or a good educational system is one that hat uses sticks in agriculture, that global warming and same sex marriage are valid issues, that pop music is an expression of an advanced culture, and a consumer economy that is dominated by investor capitalist people who think that providing humans with the employment that depict them as humans is a unjust tax and not fiscally responsible and not considerate to the environment. Green is also of the opinion that Carey is not an economist. His refutations of Malthus and Ricardo are bias so they will not be considered as evidence, that his theory on increasing the prolific powers of labor does not improve civilization, that his theory on concentration is wrong, and that man does shares in the intelligence of his Creator is wrong. Someone might ask why Carey is wrong. The answer will not come from a lawyer of John Bull.