User:Nothing1296/Eugenics Record Office/Mmp2818 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Nothing1296)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Nothing1296/Eugenics Record Office


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Eugenics Record Office

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

There are no headings and it is unorganized. Adding headings and subheadings will help make your article more visually appealing.

Very few things are cited. This questions the accuracy of the article. Adding more citations will help ensure that the information you provided is reliable. Also, you used full links to include your citations. Using the "cite" tool will help the overall quality of the article.

The information is concise and easy to read, and I believe you covered the topic.