User:Nothyme21/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Environmental anthropology

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because of my interests in biology, environmental science, and anthropology. With the heightened sense of environmental awareness of the 20th and 21st centuries, I believe looking at the historical relationship between humans and the environment to be important. I found that the article is in need of improvements. It does not flow well and is somewhat unclear.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The leading statement is neither concise nor too detailed, it is so brief that it leaves the reader unclear as to what environmental anthropology is. More clarification is needed. The content is reasonably up to date and relevant. However, the structure is muddled and does not flow comfortably. It is possible that the article contains erroneous information. I cannot confirm that the article covers wikipedia's equity gaps. The article reads as relatively neutral and does not seem to influence the reader. The article's talk page reflects similar sentiments. The article does not use any images.