User:Notjenna2001/Kanaka Creek Regional Park/Lisolemon Peer Review

General info
User:Notjenna2001
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Notjenna2001/Kanaka Creek Regional Park
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Kanaka Creek Regional Park

Lead
The Lead has been updated to reflect the work of my peers. It now contains additional information about the plants and wildlife located in the park. The Lead does include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic but has not been changed from the original article. The Lead does include a brief description of the article's major sections and dose not include any information not present in the rest of the article. For the most part, the Lead is concise, however, it could benefit from breaking up the information in the second paragraph into multiple paragraphs.

Content
The content added is relevant to the topic and seems to be up to date based on their sources and statistics. There is no content that does not belong, however, I am unsure whether there is any missing unless I do my own research into the park. The article does address the Indigenous history of the land that the park is on. The article also addresses at least five of the topics provided in our rubric. I would like to know more about if there are any endangered species that live in this park or any species that are being threatened by human interaction or climate change. I would also like to know more about how the Katzie First Nation was involved in the management process.

Tone & Balance
The content added is neutral and there are no claims that appear biased toward a particular stance. The viewpoints represented in the article are balanced in representation. The content does not seem to attempt to persuade the reader in favour of one stance or another and presents the information clearly and neutrally. I am impressed with how professional the article sounds as I read it.

Sources & References
All added content is backed up by a reliable source of information. The content does accurately reflect the information stated in the sources. The sources are thorough and after a quick Google search, it seems that the author hit the most available information in their article. The sources are current and written by a variety of sources. Although the information is not explicitly written by historically marginalized issues, the sources do go into detail about the history of the land use and the Indigenous peoples it belongs to. I think that it would be good to add some quotes or facts direct from the Indigenous peoples that live on the land this park occupies if those exist. All the links work and are up to date.

Organization
The content that has been added is well-written. The information is clear and easy to read, however, some paragraphs could be broken up into smaller portions like Paragraph 2 in Lead, the Issues paragraph, and the Management paragraph. There seems to be no major grammatical or spelling errors. The content is well organized and broken down into digestible sections that make it easy to find the information a person could be looking for.

Images & Media
The author did not add any additional images outside of the one image that was previously existing in the article. However, the article could benefit from some visual depictions of the areas they discuss as well as the plants and wildlife mentioned to enhance the understanding of the topic. The current photo is an old photo of the Kanaka Creek Falls in 1915 and it would make sense to add an updated photo as well to show what it looks like now.

Overall Impressions
The content has majorly improved the overall quality of the article and has made the article feel complete and thoroughly researched. The biggest strength of the article is the detail for each section. The authors were able to find the specific wildlife that lives in the park, the Indigenous history, the history of the name of the park, human impact on the park and information about how the park is being managed as just a few examples. The content that was added could be improved by breaking down the information into smaller chunks and adding complementary photos for information discussed like plants and wildlife. Overall, this was a really interesting article that taught me and gave me a thorough understanding of an area in BC that I previously had no knowledge of.