User:Notjenna2001/Kanaka Creek Regional Park/Yeonji Cho Peer Review

The lead part of the article is well organized and briefly describes the major contents of the articles. However, I'm not sure if you directly used the basic information that was already written in the article. If you did are we allowed to use it? Don't you have to change it into your word? You did well on bringing key points for each section to summarize. Also, how you put the reference link in the locations that readers might not know is a wise choice.

For plants and wildlife, I think it would be better to add some more descriptions for the plants and wildlife. For example, when do the salmonberries breed and when do they start growing? Are they seasonal plants etc? Also, adding images of each plant would be helpful for the readers to easily understand the plants. Also, for animals, you explained three types of salmon, and many people don't know which salmon is which, so it would be better to have images added. Were there any endangered species in the park? or information about their population and population trends? In this article, you need to include some information about the key species population like if this species' population is increasing or decreasing or stable, and adding an estimated number of population would be better.

The recreation section is pretty well organized with the information. There is information on how many visitors are visiting the protected area. As I mentioned previously, it would be better to add some images of the hiking trail, or a map of the park so readers can understand the geography of the park.

In the history section, it is good that you find the indigenous history, but I think it is kind of short for the history part. You can put the history of ecology and economy. For example, what economic change happened throughout the years around the park, and how did that change affect the ecology? For example for ecology, how did the habitat change, and what is the difference between the landscape now and past?

When you find information about the threatened or endangered species in the park, you can add it as an example in the human impact issues section. It is well organized that you divided the section of issues, groups involved and management plans. Readers can easily know what are the problems, who is trying to fix them and how are they going to fix them. Good explanation of the goal for each management strategy.

I am not sure if you are required to write the bibliography, but it would be better to put all of your references and explain why those references are reliable. Your overall tone was civil, kind, and helpful. After reviewing this article, I didn't know about this park before, so it was helpful to know more about the protected parks. There are similar issues that are a problem for many protected areas. Kanaka Creek Regional Park had a problem of habitat loss for some species. It is a serious problem around the world that humans are somewhat affecting the environment. Also, I noticed that I forgot to add some information that could be useful to add for my article assignment from this article.

Great Job!

severalfavourto addclassmatesGeneral info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)