User:Nounonymous/Christopher Schell/Alexa247 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Nounonymous


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nounonymous/Christopher_Schell?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * It doesn't exist.

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

 Lead: 

The lead is very concise and reading it gives an overview of what the article is about. It doesn't contain any redundancy.

 Content: 

The "personal life" section has limited information. If unable to find more, remove this or incorporate it in the first section (early life and education).

Is there more information on his research, which can be placed in its own section?

 Tone and Balance: 

The content is fairly balanced and contains no biases.

 Sources and References: 

The content of the article reflects the cited sources. Information is from different sources to increase credibility and reduce possible biases.

 Organization: 

Clear organization.

 Images and Media: 

Use the guiding questions if images will be incorporated.

 Notability: 

Several different sources available on the subject, hence meets Wikipedia's notability requirement.

 Overall Impressions: 

The content so far demonstrates clear support on the topic. I would suggest adding more information regarding his research and publications. If there are sources about his personal life, do add to that section, otherwise incorporate it into his early life or remove it altogether.