User:Nova Dyer/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Back to the Future Part II

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this film simply because I think it portrays a dystopian future very well under the category of dystopian films. I think it matters because it shows to completely different extremes of a timeline for a foreseeable future that can change just based upon a minor change. These visuals can display how minor things going on in a day to day life basis can influence how society as a whole can, and should make choices.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead Section: it explains in a great length detail who the film was directed by, the team who put it all together, as well as the actors who played a part in making it come to life, as well as mentioning things like the budget, as well as giving a brief idea on what the film is about.

Content: the article has overall great and relevant content embedded within it

Tone and balance: the article has a balanced tone and voice when describing and giving info needed with a neutral point of view

Sources and Relevance: All information and details given are all up to date and relevant

Organization and Writing Quality: The article manages to have a refined and higher level of writing quality overall

Images and media: the article provides multiple photos that are pertaining to specifics that are relevant and needed

Talk Page Discussion: It seems as though there are really discussions about adding specific details such as quotes or specific things that happen for the film both on screen and behind the scenes

Overall Impression: Overall the article is in great shape, a lot of time has been put into it, it's great in detail without making it too wordy, I would say this article is very well developed