User:Novem Linguae/PROD log

This is a log of all proposed deletion tags applied or endorsed by this user using Twinkle's PROD module.

If you no longer wish to keep this log, you can turn it off using the preferences panel, and nominate this page for speedy deletion under CSD U1.

February 2021

 * Python practice: PROD; notified 08:04, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Appears to violate WP:NOTTEXTBOOK. "Wikipedia is an encyclopedic reference, not a textbook. The purpose of Wikipedia is to present facts, not to teach subject matter. Articles should not read like textbooks, with leading questions and systematic problem solutions as examples."

March 2021

 * PRO/II: PROD; notified 14:44, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: After cleaning up references and double checking the two references remaining (I downloaded both books and there is no significant coverage on the cited page numbers), and doing a WP:BEFORE search, appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:NSOFTWARE.
 * Mt. Union Cemetery: PROD; notified 17:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: After WP:BEFORE search, not able to find any sources to satisfy WP:GNG. Not seeing any SNG's this would meet either (WP:NCORP, WP:GEO).
 * Jaynagar P. C. Paul Institution: PROD; notified 19:38, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: References are all WP:PRIMARY sources listing data about the school, with no critical commentary. Appears to fail WP:GNG. Does not appear to qualify under SNG's.
 * Angelina Kudryavtseva: BLP PROD; notified 17:58, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Farah Jefry: BLP PROD; notified 19:57, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Grace and St. Peter's Church (Baltimore, Maryland): PROD; notified 23:47, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: WP:BEFORE search not turning up any significant coverage in secondary sources. Doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG.
 * 4th Creative Party: PROD; notified 00:07, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: After WP:BEFORE search, only able to find one source that might qualify for GNG. The 3 references in this article are an interview, a passing mention, and the studio's website, and do not satisfy WP:GNG.
 * Andrew Hill (pharmacologist): PROD; notified 12:05, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Been tagged for notability for a month, no improvements to sourcing. His studies are used by WP:FRINGE to advocate Ivermectin as a miracle drug. No Google Scholar profile, perhaps due to how common his name is. Does not appear to pass GNG. Only bios I've found about him are "about our authors/staff" type pages, which aren't independent.
 * Maria Appel Nissen: PROD; notified 13:16, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Thank you for taking the time to translate this, but it does not appear to meet our notability guidelines. I don't see any WP:GNG passing sources (multiple paragraphs of description of her in multiple high quality sources such as newspapers and books). And she doesn't appear to pass WP:NACADEMIC. h-index of 8, her most cited paper has 23 cites.
 * Pratikur Ur Rahaman: PROD; notified 13:22, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Does not appear to pass WP:GNG. I checked all the sources, there is only a passing mention of him. To pass GNG, significant coverage is needed, which is multiple paragraphs talking about him in depth. WP:BEFORE not turning up additional GNG passing sources.
 * Cashbean: PROD; notified 17:51, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. After checking the article's 8 sources and doing a WP:BEFORE search, I could only find 1 source that passes GNG. The other sources were not independent (sounded like press releases) or did not have significant coverage.
 * Paul A. Broad: PROD; notified 03:16, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG. The 2007 Sydney Morning Herald article looks good. The 1993 SMH article (which I obtained via WP:RX) is half quotes from him and probably isn't independent enough. My WP:BEFORE search did not find additional quality sources.
 * Daniele Buetti: BLP PROD; notified 11:26, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021

 * Turbo Play: PROD; notified 06:29, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG. That is, around 3 quality sources such as books, newspapers, magazines, or review websites do not discuss the product in multiple paragraphs of detail. This is a common term, but once I adjusted my searches to include software and not include gambling, I got very few results.
 * Md Intaj Ali: PROD; notified 10:26, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:NPROF. Can't find an h-index. Zero hits in Google News. Other WP:BEFORE also didn't turn up good sources.
 * Neemat Daud Abdulrahim: PROD; notified 10:45, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Does not appear to pass WP:GNG. First three sources in the article are self-published websites so not reliable, fourth source is a passing mention so not significant coverage, fifth source is the homepage of a website with no linked article, sixth source is a paper she wrote so not independent. WP:BEFORE not turning up additional sources.
 * Cascade Brown: BLP PROD; notified 06:04, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Marie-Louise Vanherk: PROD; notified 21:54, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG. None of the current sources are significant coverage. WP:BEFORE not turning up good sources. Zero hits in Google News.
 * ValiDate: Struggling Singles In Your Area: PROD; notified 23:20, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. No WP:SECONDARY coverage of this unreleased software. WP:BEFORE not turning up additional quality sources.
 * European Association for Biometrics: PROD; notified 11:31, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Does not appear to pass WP:GNG. That is, does not have around 3 high quality sources such as newspapers or books that discuss the subject in multiple paragraphs of detail. WP:BEFORE found some passing mentions in books (but not significant coverage), and a lot of results from https://biometricupdate.com/, which appears to be a press release republishing website (at the bottom it says "Submit a Press Release").
 * Amber Rasberry: PROD; notified 09:13, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Does not appear to pass WP:GNG. Source 1 sounds based off a press release so not independent, source 2/3/4 are WP:SELFPUBLISH so aren't reliable. WP:BEFORE turned up this, but it also sounds press release based so not independent. Only passing mentions in books.
 * Renaissance one: PROD; notified 10:01, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. Source #1 is an interview so not independent, #2 is WP:SELFPUBLISH so not reliable, #3 is a passing mention so not significant coverage, #4 is positive in tone (vibrant, glorious, more than) and likely based off a press release so not independent. WP:BEFORE not turning up additional GNG passing coverage.
 * Ryan Rodrigs: PROD; notified 09:13, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Subject does not appear to pass WP:GNG. I evaluate the Toronto.com and CTV News sources as not being independent enough because they are mostly quotes.
 * Edward M. Flynn: PROD; notified 09:51, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG. The sources in the article are self-published, not significant coverage, based on interviews, or in the case of the Boston Globe source, not independent because it's based on a "handout" (the word used in the article).
 * RailBusinessDaily (RBD): PROD; notified 14:34, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG. I'm not seeing significant coverage in reliable, independent, secondary sources.
 * Atossa Therapeutics: PROD; notified 14:59, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Article has 10 sources, but they are all to the company's website (WP:PRIMARY, WP:SELFPUBLISH). WP:BEFORE search is turning up no in depth coverage. Google News first page contains republished press releases, and run-of-the-mill reporting on the company's stock price, which I would argue is not significant coverage nor of the depth required by WP:CORPDEPTH.
 * Janampet Barrage: PROD; notified 09:45, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Only appears to have 1 WP:GNG passing source (one of The Hindu articles counts, but not both). Need around 3 to pass GNG. WP:BEFORE searches not turning up much in English. Does not qualify under WP:GEOFEAT #3, which says that artificial features require GNG. Can some newspaper articles in an Indian language perhaps be added?

May 2021

 * Tramezzini NYC: PROD; notified 09:25, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Does not appear to pass WP:GNG. I evaluate these as the best GNG sources:. These have various issues, including not being long enough (3 of these are 1 paragraph), and not passing WP:CORPDEPTH.

July 2021

 * Edward Lazzerini: PROD; notified 04:04, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG or WP:ACADEMIC. No Google Scholar profile. No Google News results.
 * Sasha Wass: BLP PROD; notified 08:53, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Seyed Yashar Tavakolian: PROD; notified 07:02, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: 5 sources are short articles about a publicity stunt where he sold watermelons out of a Lamborghini. No in depth coverage, fails WP:GNG and WP:BLP1E. Likely WP:COI.
 * Solano NewsNet: PROD; notified 07:47, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Not seeing GNG passing sources in my WP:BEFORE search.

November 2021

 * Regional Housing Needs Assessment: PROD; notified 07:47, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Not seeing WP:GNG passing sources in the article nor in Google News/Google Books. Some Google Books results, but they do not appear to be WP:INDEPENDENT. The news sources lack WP:SIGCOV.
 * Yuki Kitazumi: PROD; notified 07:57, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: WP:BLP1E. Couldn't find coverage of this journalist that didn't also involve his detainment in Myanmar.
 * Mustafa Hassona: PROD; notified 10:06, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG. Can't find many articles that speak about this individual biographically and in detail. This Daily Beast Article might pass GNG, but need a couple more GNG sources to be notable.
 * Wannigan Days: PROD; notified 06:08, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Appears to only have 2 WP:GNG passing sources: and . In my opinion, need one more to demonstrate notability.  looks based on a press release, no independent analysis.
 * Science View: PROD; notified 09:10, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: I don't see any WP:GNG sources in the article or in Google News/Google Books. Suggest we find a home for this in a different article, such as BBC World Service
 * Explanatory Dictionary of the Azerbaijani language: PROD; notified 08:02, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG. This newspaper article doesn't seem independent enough, mostly quotes from the publisher. I couldn't locate additional sources.
 * Tahatint: PROD; notified 08:16, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Translation from French Wikipedia. Might not pass WP:GNG. References were hard to spot check, but second reference only has one small paragraph about the object. I also wonder if this word is used in English, most sources are in French.

December 2021

 * Faisal Sherjan: PROD; notified 15:09, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG. Can't find any WP:SIGCOV of this individual. I checked the 5 sources in this article, and also sources on Google.
 * The Return of The Ridiculously Ill-Advised, Self-Indulgent Vanity Tour: PROD; notified 16:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: My Google searches turn up many news articles that are based on press releases, so likely not WP:INDEPENDENT enough to pass WP:GNG.

June 2022

 * Lim Koon Yang: PROD; notified 07:27, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Appears to be a WP:RUNOFTHEMILL clerk. 70s is not a particularly old age to live to, clerk is not a particularly remarkable profession. The obituary sources are either too short (1 paragraph) or a couple paragraphs that mainly consist of a long list of folks that laid wreaths. Likely does not meet the "significant coverage" part of WP:GNG, not in depth enough.

July 2023

 * Bjarki Bjarkason: BLP PROD; notified 07:39, 15 July 2023 (UTC)