User:Npham28/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Kamen Rider Gaim
 * I have chosen this article because of my sudden interest on kamen rider wanting to know information about this series specifically Gaim.

Lead

 * Guiding questions

The article I am evaluating does have a introductory that clearly describes the topic. The lead did provide a brief description of the article sections about the kamen rider Gaim. Unsure but the article provides all the necessary information about the topic. The lead is concise with the article understanding about all the material about the topic.


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content

 * Guiding questions

The content provided is relevant to the topic talking about the different media forms I never knew about. The content is up to date talking about the whole series. All the content to the topic is presented does belong.


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions

The article is neutral and there is no claims of bias towards a person. The games would be a bigger description about how the game is played. The article just has information about the topic to get an understanding of the series and its history there is no persuading.


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions

All the sources are backed up by another source of information. The links that are provided do reflect the topic information. The sources are current that provides other information about different series. I have checked the links they do work.


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization

 * Guiding questions

The article is easy to read to understand the plot and history of the Kamen rider series. There is no errors in the article. The article is organized from the story, episodes of the series, video game, DvD, novel, theme music, production and casts.


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions

The article does not provide a lot of images for the topic only one for the character but it would be nice to see covers of the movies and games. The image that the article has does have a good caption of it. Yes it the images are good. The one image is laid out showing off the main character armor.


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions

There are not many conversations about the represented topic. The article is rated by start and low importance class. Also it is part of WikiProject Tokusatsu. Different how its just a did not know about the rating system.


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions

The over all status of the article is good description of the series but lacks images. The article strengths is that it explains everything the series is connected to, cast, theme and production is explained. It could get more photos of movies and games just to visually see what the cover looks like. I believe it is well developed it explained the story to me and provided the titles of movies that the character is featured in.


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: