User:Npodstawska/Somatic anxiety/Lizzymckenzie Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * I am reviewing Npodstawska's edit of the article Somatic Anxiety. She is in a group with Alexis and Antonio.
 * The link to draft I am reviewing: User:Npodstawska/Somatic anxiety

Lead

 * The Lead brushes on children with Somatic anxiety and how it affects their different performances socially and academically. This is a reflection of the new section this group added because it explicitly talks about this type of anxiety in children and what it means in childhood, as they get older, and if it goes untreated.
 * The Lead does include an introductory sentence that clearly relates to the topic and subsection they are writing on.
 * The Lead explains what Somatic anxiety is, some symptoms of it, and how it relates to children. This seems to be an area that not a tremendous amount of research has been on, but it starting to be looked into more. It mentions Cognitive anxiety and how it has been related to that, which is what the other section touches on (theories related to somatic and cognitive anxiety).
 * The Lead does not necessarily include information that is not present in the article; it is more of a generalization of what Somatic anxiety is. However, there is nothing talked about cognitive anxiety in the Lead, whereas the section in the article is about somatic and cognitive anxiety. However, it does mention children with somatic anxiety, and this group has a good section that goes into more detail.
 * The Lead is concise and fits well with the section this group added!!

Content

 * The content added is relevant to the topic and up-to-date. It is good they talked about children with this type of anxiety because often many articles and subsections talk more about adults/adolescents, so by talking about children with mental illness they are breaking the equity gap. There could be other things talked about just because this article is not detailed or has a lot of subsections, but the content that was added is very factual and beneficial. They discuss symptoms, how it affects their social life, and other risks and mental disorders that may occur because of somatic anxiety. It is also explained well how somatic anxiety can differ from others anxiety, such as social.

Tone and Balance

 * The content that is added is neutral; purely factual. There are no claims that are heavily biased, or biased. This article is merely educating those on Somatic anxiety, in their part how this relates to children which is an underrepresented viewpoint. It does not attempt to persuade the reader. The tone is well balanced, and neutral, throughout.

Sources and References

 * All new contact is backed up by a reliable source of information, and all content has references. The sources reflect what is available on Somatic anxiety in children and cover different aspects in terms of signs, and the effect this can cause on children. The sources range from current, to less current, but none are out of date. They added 7 references, some of which are easy to click on and directly take you to the page, others you can copy the title and find easily. The links work.

Organization

 * The content is well-written, concise, clear, and easy to read. They broke this section down into different paragraphs, depending on which aspect of Somatic anxiety they are looking into (the signs, the affect in one's social life, and problems that can occur in one's later life). The content added did not have any grammatical or spelling errors. This added part was written well, concise, educational, and well- organized.

Guiding questions:


 * The content that was added did improve the overall quality of the article. I think the article is more complete with this new section because it provides much more information than any other part of the article. There were many strengths; it was well-written, it was clear, it provided a variety of different, but relevant, information, and talked about how it can affect children; which is rare to see/learn about. The content can be improved by potentially adding more detail, or adding a section on teenagers/adults and their experience with it. This article does not have a lot of content included, so there are many things this group could potentially add, but the content that was added was very good and factual!!!