User:Nrdaniel/Cannabis in Louisiana/Sophiabaylis Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Nrdaniel)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Nrdaniel/Cannabis in Louisiana
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
From what I read, there is only about six sentences under background information and four references at the bottom of the article. Therefore, I am assuming there is no lead to the article, so I will have to skip answering or reviewing anything for that section. Pertaining to content, the information is relevant and up to date. There are sources that back up the information provided and the sites work. The tone is neutral and balanced, so I got the impression that the paragraph was unbiased and factual. I did not see any media for the paragraph so the author may want to include that in the future of the article. It could also use more information that goes in depth on his subject of the topic since there were only a few sentences that scratched the surface of his work on the background section.