User:Nrkjordaan/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: WikiProject Council/Directory/Culture/Sports
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. I have a deep connection with all sports. They will always have a special place in my heart.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, it does.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes, it does!
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Some in the boxes down below, yes.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is concise.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes it is.
 * Is the content up-to-date? I think so, last updated in 2019.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No, there is not any missing, nor anything that does not belong.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, it is!
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? None that I can point out.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, well organized, broken down into sections and have major points.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No images included
 * Are images well-captioned? None included.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? N/a
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?N/a

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? None come to mind at the moment!
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? It is part of WikiProjects yes,
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? It does not differ, in a way we are all consumers.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? Status is good!
 * What are the article's strengths? Addresses all the major sports in America.
 * How can the article be improved? it can add more detail for each section.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? almost complete. Need more information.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: