User:Nrodriguez41/Sterilization of Latinas

Puerto Rican Women:
When Puerto Rico became a US territory in 1898, women were targeted as their province was considered problematic by mainland governments due to increased rates of poverty and overpopulation. Puerto Rican women in New York were also subjected to the same discrimination.

Sterilization procedures were justified as these women were utilized as experimental trials to further advance birth control methods in the US. These methods often included women becoming patients at family planning clinics, exposure to contraceptive pills or shots, and clinical trials.

After the US gained ownership of Puerto Rico, it was viewed as a province in urgent need of a way to prevent greater poverty rates due to increased childbirths. This heavily impacted the US decision to begin implementing experimental birth control methods. 'Puerto Rican women in particular have served as test subjects for various contraceptive studies in the United States, of which included involuntary sterilization. Many Puerto Rican women were sterilized from the 1930s to the 1970s in order to decrease poverty and population growth in Puerto Rico. To decrease the population size of Puerto Ricans, a grant was given to the United States[ by whom?] to provide free sterilizations at the workplaces of Puerto Rican women. Though the sterilization was free, these women were often not given proper information about sterilization.'

There is a thin line between deciding whether or not sterilization procedures performed on Puerto Rican women were voluntary or forced.This was due to their own laws passed about sterilization in the 1930s, thirty to forty years before the US legalized birth control and abortion laws. There were two sterilization laws passed in Puerto Rico in 1930, one was pertaining to eugenics and the other was contraceptive. There is a debate whether or not the eugenic sterilization procedures matched those of the US, as the sterilization was seen as more voluntary rather than involuntary in Puerto Rico

Out of all the different methods performed on these women, Puerto Rican women were led to believe the sterilization procedure of tubal ligation was the most efficient method to control childbirth.

Mexican Women:
Immigration of Mexican citizens into the United States caused much controversy in how well they had adjusted to the American life and culture. Because of this, starting in the early 20th century, they were deemed as a significant problem to the community as they were believed to be mentally weak due to their prolonged adjustment to the American culture. The increase of city populations also led to the belief that mental health degraded, as more mental breakdowns seemed prevalent. This discrimination against Mexican and Mexican-Americans led to eugenics laws in which women were targeted and utilized in sterilization procedures.

Starting in the year 1909, women of Mexican descent were used as targets for the eugenics movement to reinforce population control and purity. Women of all ages were victims of the many sterilization acts performed in hospitals, correction facilities, and asylums, but younger women were especially targeted. Pacific colony, a home designated for the mentally defective in LA, California, took in many young women and quantified them as mentally defective and sexually delinquent starting in 1944. According to laws in California justifying sterilization acts, staff at this clinic deemed it was in the best interests of society to go forth with the procedure on some of the women who were sent here.

'In Los Angeles, between 1969–1973, Mexican and Chicana (Mexican-American) women were disproportionately targeted by involuntary sterilizations. A number of these women would go on to join a class action lawsuit, Madrigal v. Quilligan, discussed below.'

These Mexican and Mexican-American women were given the stereotype as “hyper-fertile” and were believed to lack the knowledge of birth control methods due to the high numbers of teen pregnancies occurring within their community. At the Hospital of LACMC, coercive sterilization was justified as it was an attempt to control the birthrate of these women. In 1998 the US government performed a census and multiyear analysis of Hispanic births and found the women of Mexican origin displayed the highest rate of childbirth compared to other hispanic women. From these statistics, the “Save our State” campaign arose and worked to enforce more eugenic sterilization of these women.

In 1973 an investigation by progressive anti-sterilization advocacy groups discovered the stories of Mary Alice’s and Minnie Lee Relf’s sterilization. This story was released by the Southern Poverty Law Center and led to the discovery of 16 thousand women and 8,000 men being sterilized using federal funds in 1972. In addition to this finding, they found more than three hundred of these patients were under the legal age of 21. Following this discovery and exposure, in 1977 Mexican-American began coming forth to file lawsuits in relation to coercive sterilization they faced while in labor.

In 1979 a bill to repeal the eugenics laws passed that legalized sterilization was proposed to the legislature in California. Many women were coerced into have the tubal ligation procedure done right after postpartum which was paid for using federal money that was dispersed into the War On Poverty first initiated by Lyndon B. Johnson.

'Many of these sterilizations were done involuntarily and without consent. Oftentimes, these women signed off on paperwork without being able to read the English language. This sterilization was seen as an unfortunate result of barriers experienced by Spanish speaking women. Other times, they were told it was necessary in order to maintain their welfare benefits. It became common to sterilize women after giving birth whether by tubal ligation or hysterectomy. Hysterectomy referring to the complete removal of a woman's uterus. Even when the women did consent, it was often under false pretenses that the procedure could be reversed if they decided to have children again in the future'

California:
'Involuntary sterilization programs were in some instances supported and funded by the states. In California, the rationale for forced sterilization was primarily for eugenics purposes, although this later shifted to a fear of overpopulation and welfare dependency.'

'California passed the third law in the United States that allowed state institutions to sterilize “unfit” and “feeble-minded” individuals. As eugenics gained credibility as a field in science, sterilization rates increased, especially after the 1927 Buck v. Bell U.S. Supreme Court decision, which upheld the constitutionality of sterilization laws in Virginia. See below. According to available data, California performed one third of all reported sterilization procedures in the United States between 1910 and 1960.'

Although the Californian state was the third state to legalize sterilization as mentioned previously, it has made the greatest impact by performing over half of the sterilization procedures throughout the eugenics era from 1907 to 1979. Their laws granted prison authorities and asylum medical superintendents the right to sterilize a patient if it would be proven to better their conditions. It surpassed the other 32 states who had passed eugenics laws due to its large hispanic incarnation rates and advocacy found within the eugenics movements.

Indiana:
Indiana passed the first sterilization law in the US during 1907. It was proposed as a part of the Progressive era wave in which public health advocacy began coming to light.