User:Nsbdoc/Human reproduction/Cic 1234 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Nsbdoc, Gunnarmattson, Kendall.islam


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Human reproduction
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Human reproduction

Evaluate the drafted changes
Overall, the drafted changes for the "human reproduction" article are great and very comprehensive. All of the content is relevant to the topic area and allows for an extensive understanding of the content. In addition, there are supplemental sections in this article which include the discovery of mechanism. There is an ample amount of peer-reviewed resources that aid in supporting the content material of the article. Throughout the article, there is not any bias that is incorporated in the writing, and the body of the text is built on the foundation of scientific references. Lastly, there does not seem to be any information that is outdated.