User:Nsbdoc/Human reproduction/Inquirybianx Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Gunnarmattson) (Kendall.islam) (Nsbdoc)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Human reproduction
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Human reproduction
 * Human reproduction

Evaluate the drafted changes
'''Chosen references provided information about the current state of knowledge regarding application gender-inclusive language in pregnancy-related research. This is especially important for this article topic (Human Reprodution), as the article previously lacked language that adequately reflects the diversity of gender identities and expressions that exist independent of biological sex determined by chromosomes and/or external/internal genitalia. The addition of “person with testes” and “person with ovaries” throughout the article is more inclusive and more helpful for individuals who may not fit or identify with discrete categories of “man” and “woman.” Furthermore, I found the lead paragraph comprehensive and neutral in tone. There were a variety of links provided -- all of which were intact and helpful for anyone who needs additional clarification for some of the terms listed (e.g., gametes, zygotes). I found that each section was relevant to the topic. I felt it was necessary to include the legalities of reproduction and touch on the concept of sex education (for which there was a link for further reading). The organization of the article facilitated a broad understanding of reproduction, which then became more granular as the process of fertilization was discussed. If I had to provide one piece of constructive feedback, I would clarify that the latent and active stage 1 of labor are separated by dilation of cervix by 6-10 cm, and beyond 10 cm is usually when Stage 2 begins. There were no distractions in the article, as the history of discovery of the mechanism of human reproduction was offered at the end. This page was really well done! It was a pleasure reviewing it :)'''