User:Nsnoel/Esmeralda Santiago/Gabyhanze Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Nsnoel


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Nsnoel/sandbox/new sandbox


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Esmeralda Santiago

Evaluate the drafted changes
This current draft of your article has a lot of good information, both biographical and literary. I like that there are separate sections for her literary works. I also think that you have a good amount of sources for your article as well.

Some of my primary critiques are formatting aspects. I am not sure why there are two different references lists, but it’s probably just an editing error. All the sources should be listed in one place. Another thing is to remember to label your sections as headings so that they appear as headings. It doesn’t look like you have added all of the headings that you are going to include in your article yet so remember to do that. The last thing about formatting is that it would be helpful if you could rename the sandbox “Esmeralda Santiago” because it was slightly harder for me to find.

My most important critique so far is to remember to phrase the information in your own words. Just by looking at some of your sentences and glancing at your sources, I noticed that some of the phrasing was very similar and I don’t want you to get flagged for plagiarism. Be mindful of that as you add more and more information into your draft.

One last technical note I would give you is to remember to put the citations after the punctuation.

Overall, I think this is a really good start to your article in terms of content. The main things I would focus on is making sure you aren’t accidentally plagiarizing from your sources and fixing the formatting errors I mentioned.