User:Nt4uic/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Rh blood group system

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because it is of Mid-importance and is rated as C-class, so there are improvements that can be made. This topic is important because it is the basis of some hemolytic transfusion reactions, most notably being hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. My preliminary impression of the article is that it is well-organized and contains a lot of detailed information. However, several citations are missing which detracts from the reliability of the article. Also, some of the subtopics don't have as much information.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead section: The lead section is succinct and clearly written. It provides a brief introduction to the topic and everything in the section is discussed further in the article.

Content: The subtopics within the article are relevant to the topic. Some of the subtopics contain less information, such as the Population data and Genetics sections.

Tone and Balance: The article has a neutral tone and does not have skewed viewpoints or opinions.

Sources and References: Most of the references seem to be reliable secondary sources, however there are some primary sources. Also, several citations are missing.

Organization and writing quality: The article is well-organized and there are no grammatical errors or typos.

Images and media: The included images are relevant to the topic and have detailed captions.

Talk page discussion: This article belongs to WikiProject Physiology and WikiProject Medicine. It does not seem like the most active talk page, with the most recent comment being in 2/2022.

Overall impressions: This article contains well-organized, detailed information and could benefit from having updated citations that are from reputable secondary sources. Also, several areas of the article could benefit from having additional information.