User:Ntackabery/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Felony murder and the death penalty in the United States
 * It is a topic that I am interested in that has its foundation in case law and the Constitution.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * The lead does include a sentence describing the article's topic, but it does miss introductory details. The lead almost immediately delves into the discussion of the topic, instead of giving a good overview.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * The lead discusses some of the article's major sections, but dismisses some and also includes extraneous details.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No, but some of what is in the lead is glazed over and does not seem to be the important details being discussed.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * The lead is overly detailed. It gets into the details too quickly and doesn't discuss the broader topic as much.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Missing content; There is also a large section discussing the concurring opinion of Justice Brennan in one particular case which is important but does seem to be a large portion of the article.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * There is a large portion on the concurring opinion of Justice Brennan, but not as much information about the actual case.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * No there are large portions of the article that are not cited.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * The only references that are cited are cases that relate to the topic.
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes, but there aren't many sources.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * It is clear and concise.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * The article is not well organized. The sections don't fit together well.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * No images
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * No images
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * No images
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * No images

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * No conversations since 2006. Discussions were regarding adding a separate page for a few of the cases mentioned in the article, which has since been done.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * The article is rated as a Start Class. It is part of the WikiProject on Crime.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * I haven't discussed the topic of the article in class.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * The article is rated of low-importance and seems to be a work in progress.
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * The article seems to be unbiased and uses clear language.
 * How can the article be improved?
 * The article can be improved with better organization of headings and paragraphs. It could also be improved by writing a new lead.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
 * The article is underdeveloped because it is missing information.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: