User:Ntr1000/Cerein/Biochemlad Peer Review

The lead gives a quick and detailed description of what the article is about. It includes info about the clinical research section. It is organized well. and is kept neutral. The information is relevant to the topic, the sources are reliable and appear to be secondary sources.

General info
Ntr1000
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Cerein
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Cerein

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)