User:Ntroops/Computer algebra/Mbraile Peer Review

General info
Ntroops
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ntroops/Computer_algebra?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Computer algebra

Evaluate the drafted changes
It does not look like there is much here to review yet, but so far your rewrites have a consistent, neutral tone that Wikipedia has. I think it is good that you have tagged/linked certain words in your rewrites to other Wikipedia articles, however your first sentence has information that I believe you could cite and list in your references. You do not currently have any references, so make sure that you are adding in as many as possible.

I thought that your second edit that talks about Euclid does a great job of taking the information from the original article and rewriting it in a shorter, clearer, and more concise way. It made it much easier to understand while reading it, versus the original article.

Both edits have sentences that have been started but not completed, so I am interested to see where else you take the article. Although those sentences are currently unfinished, I am glad they are there because it shows that you are planning on making more edits.

One area of the original article that I think you could flesh out is the "Computer science aspects" section, as that section is flagged with having no citations. I am sure that you could find scholarly articles to use to cite the information in that section, especially since it you seem to have a good amount of sources compiled in your bibliography for women in math and overlooked contributors. You could definitely talk about this in a social barriers section.

While there is not much here that I can evaluate you on, this seems to be a good start.