User:Nyahbenett/Literacy in the United States/Daniellesori Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

User:Nyahbenett


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nyahbenett/Literacy_in_the_United_States?preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Literacy in the United States

Evaluate the drafted changes
Hi Nyah, here's my peer review:

Lead


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? - Unsure if a lead is updated to reflect the sections, but your draftbox reflects great contributions!

Content


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? - Your additions include links to existing Wikipedia articles to refer back to as well as 3 citations.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? - Yes, articles seem to be retrieved up-to-date.

Tone and Balance


 * Is the content added neutral? - Yes; phrases like "studies show" reflect that. However, there are sections where it might not be as neutral, like "Without distinguishing curriculum and standards, English language learners and children from low-income families fall behind their peers."
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? - For the sentences that are expanding on existing documentation, they might be overrepresented.

Source and References


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? - Yes

Organization


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? - Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? - The bolded sections might be a bit confusing, but reflects your contributions.

Overall Impressions


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? - Yes!

-Danielle