User:Nyamai2018/sandbox

This research used two methods; review of the literature on Ken Robinson, as well as field survey whereby interviews were conducted on a few individuals. The literature review involved reviews and testimonials that other authors have produced on the work done by Ken Robinson. It enabled me to get a critical summary of the knowledge of Ken Robinson and his principles on creativity. Analyzing the existing literature gave me a chance to identify any criticisms and weaknesses of the works. The undertaking of the literature review as a method of research requires one to possess several skills that enable them to analyse the data and information obtained. The information is generally found in books and articles written by other authors and editors. I applied my creative skills to synthesise the information pick out the points related to my research study. There are several benefits that I gained by getting access to various literature resources. Some of them include the following. •   I gained an impression of the critical aspects of Ken Robinson and his work. •   I identified several sources of data concerning the topic from the literature review. •   I familiarized with the Harvard style of writing since it was the most commonly used in most of the resources and articles. •   I established how the concepts in the various sources were related to each other. •   I also got the chance to identify ways through which the existing literature could be enhanced and made deeper in the future. •   Analysing the content enabled me to identify mistakes that I could avoid making my research study more reliable and error-free than previous studies. •   I enhanced my creativity, critique, and reading skills. This comprehensive literature review was selected as the best method to use in this research for several reasons. •   Its significance and knowledge gained on the topic of study are up-to-date. Several sources were used, and the most significant and relevant points and information picked. •   The methods employed in the sources were identified and validated for success. •   It assisted me to frame the research questions and answer them satisfactorily, making the research success. •   The available literature created room for comparisons with the findings that I found out. A field survey was also conducted. It entailed interviews with people in the education field or others interested in creativity. Willing parties gave critical information on the views and took on the level of creativity in the education system. They also offered suggestions on how the current system can be improved to promote creativity among learners.