User:Nycgirl00/Doge of Venice/Eddiwong Peer Review

Lead: Clear and concise introduction with the necessary information. No changes really needed.

Content: The content in the article is very informative and clear. There is a lot of sufficient information provided. Maybe you could add more information that is related to our course (doges in relation to art and painting?).

Tone and balance: The tone of the article is neutral, unbiased, and factual. No changes needed.

Sources and references: There seem to be a few paragraphs that don't have citations/footnotes. If you added them, make sure to cite them.

Organization: The article is very organized, the sub-sections and sub-headings make the article very digestable and easy to navigate.

Images and media: I believe you could add more images to the article. Perhaps images or paintings of the previous doges? We've seen many in our class so maybe you could add some of those.

Overall impressions: The content is very strong and the article is very organized. The article does not need many changes, just a few adjustments that I have mentioned above.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)