User:Nyxipedia

Hello, i am an irregular contributor and text editor, and an infrequent but more active commenter on the talks pages. I am interested in almost everything, but not always apt to love every subject. Discussion is not my favourit on wiki, as i early on analysed the structure of it's decissionmaking mechanisms mayb open to an extend and democratic in some others, but are far from being without bias.

So i like being a footnote. See what neutral observation, contrary positioning, and complex reason add to the encyclopedical spirit.

I am very concerned with integrity of history, and as such somewhat in conflict with the fossil of darwinism, a (judeo)christian context. aka western culture.

I am a convinced and dedicated antikapitalist, in the better case in my opinion money soon ceases to exist completely, or being anything more significant then (thinks...) a button to make the traffic light go green.

as such i form an adversary for much of the ruling system, and it roughed me up a lot in return. I know from 1st hand experiences even a tolerant and seemingly progressive justice like the dutch, in fact, in the letter of the law, is a joke. A thing easily observed in most political systems.

So i am an anarchist, any concentration of power leads to abuse, property is an easy example, obviously the trick is to force governance out of it's context of power to make it work. That goes for indirect governance as well, money and fear for example are factors that have to be desempowered before individual freedom becomes a reality.

I am open to discussion, this a talks page, altho i expect the usual enthusiasm, i am limited in that i am not ready to answer clichee upon clichee, bias upon bias, and prejudice upon prejudice.

Don't ask for what you know and you may learn something you don't.

One reason for me to write this is people may think i am controversial, or any number of things, i am not very interested in the wiki community (although i have seen a load of good stuff as well). Perhaps when people think i am polarised, this helps.

I like writing, obviously, so,.. well the ideal wiki (..), perhaps evrything should come in 3 versions?, conservative, progressive, and odd version, is like a harmless bible or koran, something that could spell people and still teach them to write.

For being a spiritual master people need to cling to a thoroughly different set of values then most are used to, since it really doesn't hurt to know a lot, and understand things easy, see the 'hidden' implications and facts ... to be creative and find new words, that is like thinking 'differently', it is also essential to let prevail justice (and a very mercifull and social one).

Since the reward is it spans lifetimes, the project is one that spans lifetimes naturally. I can't 'proof' that, except perhaps by being "me" or see 'you' being you, but that is how it is.

Still love is a generous resource, it is not that hard, and the rewards don't come late. I am convinced anyone can reach a state of mind that will allow her to continue on a better trail every next time.

We live in a strange world, it is one that creates martyrdom, already for century's, there is no real need for that. It is live is deadly without extra efforts.

Love and knowledge are almost the same. People don't know how the driving force, of life or the will of the universe to create any circumstance, and the endless possibility's on any material plane (everything is relative), could be love.

Thus the option love would be mind and it's implications, is the strongest magic. Nyxipedia (talk) 06:05, 16 November 2008 (UTC)