User:Nzacharis/sandbox

= Article Evaluation Laura Tremosa =

Evaluating Content
Yes, everything in the article is relevant to the article topic. There is nothing that distracts or draws my attention away from the topic. There is no information that is out of date ,but the article can be improved. The article is very short and only contains four sources. More information about Laura Tremosa and what she accomplished can be added to improve the quality of the article. For example, the article lists two selected works but does not go into any detail about them. This is one area in which the article can be improved.

Evaluating Tone
Yes, the article is entirely neutral. Since the article is very short there is not really any room for bias.

Evaluating Sources
Some of the links do not work. However, the sources do support the authors claim in the article. The author of the article just put the references to the sources at the end of article. This does not help reference where each individual fact is from. The information comes from a Spanish newspaper and various books. The sources are not biased. Even though some are from a newspaper, those are not biased.

Evaluating the Talk Page
There are no conversations on the talk page. The article is stub class and is not a part of any WikiProjects. Wikipedia provides a more neutral, fact based discussion. In class, we discuss topics by combining the opinions of various people to come to a conclusion. We have not specifically discussed Laura Tremosa in class even though she is a woman in STEM history.

Erna Hamburger
One of her major innovations was her creation of an apparatus for radio-wave reception.