User:ODSez/Tik Tok/Samamc94 Peer Review

Peer review
Your article is well balanced and not biased in anyway and shows some very insightful things. However, one thing I think that is not mentioned that DouYin is not Tik Tok. The company Byte tries to brand it as such but they are two different platforms. The way that is written give the impression of being one in the same when they are not. While they are owned by the same company they are two different apps to comply with different regulations as Mainland China and international have always had some conflicts.

While also Kevin Mayer is the CEO the articles also fails to mention the owner of the company Zhang Yiming, who is a Chinese National. CEOs are imperative, but a lot of the issues that come to arise with Tik Tok in an international setting is because of the owner. Your article title is just Tik Tok, I would suggest making it a bit more narrow in focus. For instance, Tik Tok's origins and International outreaches/struggles.

Tencent fact about suing DouYin was fine and relevant, but then the added part of other companies suing is bit much. The other content should be condensed and put together to make it more cohesive and not separate. The tone of the article remains neutral (from my perspective) and balanced on information, just a bit off topic in some areas.

Viral trends could be edited into something more like the application of Tik Tok or something to that extent. The Artificial Intelligence section seems to be a short add in as well and might need some clean up or possible deletion. It is useful to the article because it is added content and relevant, but needs to be incorporated a bit more organically.

The most important I think was the neutral toned, especially now this is a hot button topic and issue on the political stage. The writer well balances and all comments and edits I suggest are minor things in my mind. There are some content things that should be addressed but still well.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?