User:OSabates/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
2018 Israeli LGBT's strike

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this particular article because it demonstrated the support that business outside of the government had for the protests. It gained momentum in places that one would suspect would be neglected.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead Section

- The introductory sentence does clearly state what the article will be about.

-The lead paragraph did do a good job of explaining the rest of the article.

-The lead does not include any information that is outside of the article.

-The lead is concise and not overly detailed.

Content

-the article is up to date and the topics are relevant

-there is not info that doesn't belong but there is information that is highlighted red.

-the information does involve a marginalized group.

Tone and Balance

-the article was neutral and did not try to persuade the reader in one direction or another

-it did not overrepresent/under represent any one topic

Sources and References

- I do believe that the information is enticing, however, the source are not majority from online journals from the Jerusalem post and timesofisrael.com

-there could definitely be a more wide array of reputable sources.

Writing Quality

-The article was well written, very through, and concise

Images and Media

-I do believe the images to be pertinent to the information and placed correctly, however to of them are not accredited to a certain source.

Overall Impression

- I overall thought that it was a really interesting and well written article.