User:OTatro/Biodiversity and drugs/Chipmonkey9 Peer Review

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:OTatro/Biodiversity and drugs
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Biodiversity and drugs

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead:

-nothing in lead was edited and while it currently looks good I wonder if anything after the first three sentences is too specific for the lead

Content:

-relevant and up to date

-since the article includes uses of fungi and plants in medicine you could create a section about uses of animals in medicine (horseshoe crabs etc.)

Tone + Balance:

-non-biased, neutral tone

Sources:

-the sources are credible since they are peer reviewed papers and they are current

-everything you added was cited so wonderful job :)

Organization:

-I would input it after the sweet wormwood section when you add it to the current article; what you have is organized well

-it is very well written and easy to read :)

Images and Media:

-none added although I just saw that we need them in our rubric for our class

Comments:

I noticed on your bibliography page you didn't have anything in the outline of proposed changes spot. I don't know if that's even necessary but it will take 2 seconds so I would maybe do it just in case. Same with including if the sources you found contribute to notability or credibility in the sentence about them (just put that they are credible because they are peer reviewed scientific articles). What you have is really, really good. I'm worried about amount of content added vs grading though and both of us need to add some sort of image(s) or media. I tried to make suggestions to make the additions easier for you and let me know if you have any questions! Well done!