User:Oakinfe1/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article: Digital Rhetoric

 * Name of article: Digital rhetoric
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
 * I chose this article because we are learning about technofeminism in class and to understand that it would be useful to have a good understanding of digital rhetoric.

Lead


The lead is clear and concise and does a good job of defining relevant terms.

Content


All of the content looks up to date and seems relevant to the topic.

Tone and Balance


I think the content is neutral and is not trying to persuade the reader to believe any particular thing.

Sources and References
Information seems to be properly cited. All of the links I tried took me to a present page with relevant information.

Organization

 * Guiding questions
 * The article is well organized and broken into sections for easier reading. It also seems that is is free from grammatical errors.

Images and Media


There is only one image of a student using a computer in class.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions

There is a lot of conversation on the talk page. It consist of people offering better titles and suggesting information that may or may not be relevant. It is currently apart of four WikiProjects including Media, Philosophy, Linguistics, and Computing. It is rated as a start-class under all four WikiProjects but it seems to be a pretty good article and probably requires more citations from credible sources.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? Start-class
 * What are the article's strengths?Organization
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? Well developed.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: