User:OaklandGrizzly/John VI of Portugal/IIOliveBranchII Peer Review

General info
Lead is a little long, but everything seems like good information for the page, so I think you'll be fine with the length since it isn't overly detailed

Neutral language is good

Adding sources will be your best bet since there isn't a whole lot except the two at the beginning.

Making sure sources are secondary sources once you find some and put them in, as well as more recent sources and not older ones if they're available.

Adding a diverse set of sources might be useful too depending on where you put them in the article.

Imbedded links are working, and there are a good number of them so it does look like other wiki articles and makes it easier to find.

Additions are well written.

I can't exactly tell what you added yourself since it is in the actual wiki page, but everything reads very strong, and it connects well with everything else in the article.


 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)