User:Oaklandstudent/Patagonia Rebelde/Tuatarasallthewaydown Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Oaklandstudent


 * Link to draft you're reviewing Patagonia Rebelde Sandbox
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Patagonia Rebelde

Evaluate the drafted changes
Flavius has not added a ton of information. He did not add or change a lead. I would not recommend adding anything to it because all of the information he is adding is minor details, where the lead is for major details.

The content is seems to be useful within the article, it is all minor details that fill in some gaps within the content. I would continue to find possible gaps in the main article, verses adding smaller details.

The tone is fine. All the information written down are explained clearly without bias, just rephrasing of the sources.

For citing sources, he is going to want to properly add the sources in using the cite function in the sandbox. Without this, it wouldn't be easy to add this information to the article as it is. Otherwise his sources are updated as much as it can be, a lot of information about this tends to be older, so you get what you can.

There is no organization. I would make sure that you make sure all the information fits well inside the article. I recommend copying and pasting the info from the wiki article and adding the information like that, so you can make sure it flows well.

There are no images that Flavius has, therefore nothing to comment on.

Overall, there is not much to go on. I recommend exploring more sources where you can see if there is a content gap. On top of that I would figure out where you plan to put the pieces of information you already have within the article.