User:ObiWalls/Weathering hypothesis/Emedmunds Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

ObiWalls


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Weathering hypothesis


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
I see absolutely no original content. The content you have is simply copied and pasted without the citations found in the original article. There is nothing I can really do to peer edit when there is no work. We see in the original article who first proposed the weathering hypothesis and how it was first proposed. I like the "see also" section that is there- I believe that shows readers who know nothing about the topic a little more about what is related to the topic and where it fits in.I think adding a section of Further Studies and finding at least three or four further studies that give more meaning to the hypothesis. The links are already there to show further studies, but if they were illustrated out in a section on the page, it would improve the article. All of the information is there, it just needs to be laid out.