User:Obiss1/sandbox

Notes on Articles
On "The Chrysanthemums", I noted a box that said the article lacked inline citations. This obviously makes it difficult to verify the origin of the information in the article. Another thing I noted was the subjectivity of some of the character descriptions, it states that the husband "loves" her passion for gardening but I feel like that could be easily disputed considering I see it as him thinking its trivial.

On "Paul's Case" I noticed that there is a section entitled "Overview" which touches on the time the story took place like what was popular, trends and industry etc. But it then suddenly turns to an entire (brief but still entire) plot summary. This would be ok if there wasn't a section immediately below it entitled "Plot Summary" where the same thing is reiterated. I think for organizational purposes it would make sense to expand the Overview section and exclude the plot summary.

On "A Rose for Emily" there is a section dedicated to the structure of the story. While this is interesting, I almost feel that it's unnecessary. It could probably be placed into the plot summary section as a precursor to the summary. It includes these two sentences,"In terms of mathematical precision, time moves on and what exists is only the present. In terms of the more subjective time, time moves on but memories can exist no matter how much time changes". While it kind of makes sense, I feel it's confusing and unnecessary. It's a very factual statement that anyone can infer, I don't see it needing to be in the article.

On "Parker's Back" I realized there is no section dedicated to Themes which is something I believe all the other articles I read so far have had. There is however, a section entitled Byzantine Christ. This is very specific. I feel like Christ, religion etc. could be lumped into a portion of a longer section for themes.