User:Ocaasi/DRintro

I've invited a few editors here to discuss some issues related to the article. Some ground rules to keep in mind: Thanks!
 * Stay civil, polite, even kind. This is not a battleground, and we're here to write an encyclopedia.
 * This is not a court room. Legal accusations are rarely if ever appropriate for interacting with the Wikipedia community; in fact, should you make them you will likely not be able to participate further.  For that matter, any commentary about another editors' motivations is usually just a distraction.  Try to focus on the content, not the contributor.
 * Our task is to neutrally summarize published, reliable sources in proportion to the coverage their views receive. If you plan to make a claim about the state of the world, cite a source.  It should be a respected book, established magazine, expert website, academic journal, trade publication, or other media from a publisher with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy.  Self-published blogs, forums, social media, and personal/unestablished websites rarely make good secondary sources.
 * Primary documents are rarely appropriate to settle disputes, especially legal documents; we rely on secondary sources which summarize the state of evidence.
 * If you have a personal or professional vested interest in the state of this article, then you probably should not edit it but instead should stick to the talk page (this page) and make your case to others who can review your proposals and approve changes. If you disagree with the current state of the article, outline a specific piece, claim, or statement and suggest an alternative while providing sources which inform your proposal.
 * Please sign your comments with