User:Oceana428/Anime/CLS1111 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Oceana428


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Anime
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Anime

Evaluate the drafted changes
I would say the lead is pretty solid as it is. Any more edits may pull the neutrality of the statement away. I would maybe add the content that will be discussed in the article since they were not all included. As for the content, All the content looks very up to date especially with the multitude of resources supporting this article. As I noted earlier, the neutrality of the article is solid as is, but adding too much material will muddy the view of the article so make sure there isn't too much info. All links appear to be current and up to date. I checked a few to make sure they worked and they did. Overall I believe the article is very balanced and developed due to it having many contributors. It may be hard to find things to change but improving the style of the info would be a good start.