User:Oceanflynn/sandbox/Science research bibliography

Science research bibliography

The American Cancer Society undertook a series of Cancer Prevention Studies to study links between tobacco and cancer. The three studies began with the recruitment of subjects in October 1959 and eventually included over a million subjects. The second study revealed an increase in lung cancer mortality rates in women who smoked. The Cancer Prevention Study II was "a key guide to national policy and changing public attitudes" in terms of the link between cigarette smoking and lung cancer.

In 1993 Harvard researchers published their findings from the federally-funded Six Cities Study in which they had "followed more than 8000 participants for 14 to 16 years and found an association between death rates and particulate matter, or soot, in the air". The "groundbreaking paper on the impact of air pollution"... "informed EPA’s 1997 decision to tighten its air quality standards and continues to underpin Clean Air Act regulations."

Representative Lamar Smith (R-TX), the "senior Republican on the House of Representatives science committee" "repeatedly requested that EPA hand over raw data from the "Six Cities Study" and from a related (and much larger) federally-funded American Cancer Society study known as "Cancer Prevention Study II," plus all subsequent reanalysis of the studies. He accused the [EPA] of using "secret science" to justify environmental regulations." The EPA argued that handing over the raw data "would violate the trust of hundreds of thousands of Americans who had participated in the Six Cities Study and other research included in the subpoena."

Smith subpoena's EPA for raw data (2013)
On August 1, 2013, Representative Lamar Smith (R-TX), the "senior Republican on the House of Representatives science committee", "issued a controversial subpoena" to EPA ...for all the federally-funded raw health data from a number of government-funded studies that linked "air pollution to disease" and which "underpin a number of far-reaching federal regulations."

Resetting U.S. Climate Policy
Joseph Bast, president of The Heartland Institute, called for the Trump administration to defund and eventually replace the EPA with agencies at the States level at their 12th annual conference entitled "Resetting U.S. Climate Policy" held in Washington, D.C. on March 23-24, 2017. Bast argued that climate change was a "remote threat." "I don't see a grassroots movement in the United States saying ... we want to keep this global warming thing going. I think that's collapsing pretty fast."

Climate Science: Assumptions, Policy Implications, and the Scientific Method
Michael E. Mann was one of four expert witnesses on a panel along with Judith Curry, Roger A. Pielke Jr. John Christy at a March 29, 2017 House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology hearing entitled "Climate Science: Assumptions, Policy Implications, and the Scientific Method" chaired by Representative Lamar Smith (R–TX). Mann was the sole scientist on the panel who "espoused views and research" that represented the "mainstream scientific consensus surrounding anthropogenic climate change". During the hearing, Mann cited a March 24, 2017 article by Jeffrey Mervis published in Science—the peer-reviewed academic journal of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) and one of the top scientific journals globally. which Mervis claimed that Smith had spoken at the Heartland Institute’s 12th annual conference entitled "Resetting U.S. Climate Policy" held in Washington, D.C. March 24, 2017. chairman Smith was on record at the Heartland Institute — which Mann described as a Koch-brothers-funded "climate change denying" agency, Koch Brothers funded outlet that has a climate change denier conference every year Smith dismissed "commentary presented during testimony on climate change because it came from the journal Science — one of the oldest and most prestigious scientific publications in existence". During a "testy exchange" between Smith and Lamar, Lamar cited Smith claimed that "That is not known as an objective writer or magazine." Curry called on the Trump administration to "preserve and even increase funding for climate observation systems, threatened by Trump’s "skinny budget". "Observing systems — ocean and satellite — is money very, very well spent. I urge you to support continued funding of these.""

- Judith Curry "Climate Science: Assumptions, Policy Implications, and the Scientific Method" March 29, 2017

Representative Elizabeth Esty (D–CT) called for funding robust open-sourced researched. "At some point we have to go with consensus while continuing research."