User:Ocmd21/GreenMantra Technologies/Emeraldwoozy Peer Review

The lead does include an introductory sentence. The information in the lead is precise and efficiently gives an overview of the information in the article. The content added is relevant to the topic. The content could be more up to date with the information present. There could also be some more sections added with more information, the article would be improved with more information on the topic. All of the content present is neutral, the article is listing accomplishments of the company but not taking a stand on any one perspective. There is no bias or persuasion taking place. The links provided do work and the sources are credible. The sources could be more current though with more up to date information. The content is well written and well organized but I think some more sections could be added. The article does not contain any images but I believe that would make a good addition to support the information with a visual. The most important thing to take not of would be the date of the information, adding some more current status updates would be beneficial to the articles credibility and accuracy.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)