User:Ocmd21/GreenMantra Technologies/Pringlesandluffy Peer Review

In review of the article GreenMantra Technologies, this article summarizes on transforming plastic into a better more economically beneficial product for landfills. Overall, this Wiki article is a short one. However, it does how a good amount of information considering that fact that finding information on GreenMantra Technologies is already a challenge. The start of the article in a nice summery os what the topic is however there is no source in fact there is only 1 reference in the entire wiki page total. This is a huge problem as this cannot go off only 1 source. There needs to be more sources and citations. Going in the background section, this starts to drive into sort of a history and development of the GreenMatra Technology? The start of this section starts off very week, the first sentence is not well it does not provide the start of it, this just going into the funding, now how does this provide any background. Now the next subsection paragraph I well as it describes the processes that goes in, and it highlights key areas that a reader may not know so they can hover over the word and see what the sord may mean. However, again with the first section there is no citation and no source being used to back up these claims so how would we know these topics. Adding citations to the top would be very helpful to the reader and editing the first sentence would be key to improving this section. Heading into the news section, it highlights possible news that relates to the topic at hand. Now reading this section, there is not much to tie into the news it talks about topics, but it can’t tie into the news. So, we see how it developed technology developed waste to turn polystyrene into styrene polymers for ink. But where is the news on this? How is the reader going to know that this is news? There needs to be facts on news like an article or a citation source added in. How else would one know this was news. Finally in the Recognitions, this is just a small added in section. This feels like it was added in just to make the wiki page have more to it and nothing more as these could have been in the new section. Also where are the sources and citations? How is there only one source at the bottom. The biggest problem with this wiki forum is that there is only one citation source for the entire page and yet so many things being pulled from news and recognitions and stuff that need cites added in. So, if these could be added this would make the article better. As well as making the news section a real news section. With these changes this article could be better.