User:Octobercosmos/Desert greening/BubblyBublik Peer Review

General info
Nayebean, Octobercosmos
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Octobercosmos/Desert greening
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Desert greening
 * Desert greening

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

The introduction is clear and describes the articles title. There is a lot of good information that describes desert greening especially for the readers that do not know what desert greening is and why it happens. However, starting off the article, writing the definition of desert greening is too early and I believe should be done in another paragraph or sentence. A lot of good information, and the lead has a good summarization on the article.

Content

The content is up to date I don't think that a lot of information is missing and the article is straightforward.

Tone and Balance

There is nothing biased in the article, the sources that were added are also not biased since the article strictly sticks with one topic and stays neutral.

Sources and References

The sources and References are overall up to date one of the articles is very new "Climate Action" and has been posted on 07/10/23. They have reliable sources as well as a scientific paper. The sources backs up with article. The links for the sources work but I was unable to open up one the sources. Some sources also comes from a governmental website (.org) which is more reliable than sources that can be biased as well as wrong information. While reviewing the different sources I find it very cool that the writer added a source from NASA which contains a video of air temperature around the world throughout the years changing, this source helps back up the article.

Organization

The content is very clear to read and concise. The lead is long and clear however, more information can be added in the body. A reader that is new to this topic would easily understand the article because of how well it is written.

Images and media

Looking at the article first article, Desert Greening, there are very few images, 3 to be exact. One of the images in the article isn't important which was the Lake Tuendae, there isn't much going on even though it is picturesque. The other two pictures are relevant and important. There aren't grammatical errors.

For New Articles Only

There were plenty of sources that were added in the article. The article follows the Wikipedia notability requirements. The article follows similar patterns of other articles and the article itself contains discoverable sources.

Overall Impressions

Overall, I didn't think I would enjoy an article this much. Not only did I find it interesting but I need to learn more about it! The article is well written and very precise