User:Octobercosmos/Desert greening/MBHeavyMetal Peer Review

General info
Octobercosmos, Nayebean
 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Octobercosmos/Desert greening
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Desert greening

Lead
Guiding questions:

The lead of the article has been altered with more information regarding the topic by my peers. They have expanded the lead with more concise and further description that reflects the topic. Upon comparing the article to draft, my peers have organized the newly information to make it easier for my layperson to follow along and already understand if the information provided it what they were looking for. In my opinion this was a good addition to the lead

Content
Guiding questions:

The content added is related to the topic. The article prior to the draft did not necessarily describe many of the information my peers added. The descriptive lead and addition of the history subcategory was a good idea. This will allow the readers to have an a comprehension on the history of the ecological stance then just a definition of what it is. This can possibly explain the 'why'.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:

The draft and article have a neutral tone and is written in an informative way instead of a bias stand point. There is a balance of information and neutral standing. The article's original form and what my peers have to offer will without a doubt expand on this topic's definition.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:

My peers provided references that were easily accessible and reliable. The informative taken and article used reflects without any confusion of where the information came from.

Organization
Guiding questions:

This article is well written and as I can see is still in it's infancy phase. I hope my peers will have the opportunity to increase the knowledge this topic has to offer. As mentioned before, the addition of the history section was a great idea in order to develop this page further.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

No new images were added.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:

The content added by my peers were detailed and concise information that can aid build this page from it's infancy phase. My peers did an extensive amount of research thus far and have already improved the article when it becomes time to add it to the page. I look forward to reading more about this article actually and understand the reasoning behind such phenomena.