User:Odaikkuma/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Politics in education

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article to evaluate because I was looking for politics science and couldn't fin'd it on the first page of resources you gave us and this article had something similar to what I was looking for and needed a lot of evaluating.

Evaluate the article
The lead section overall good, it has an introduction sentence that describes the two main roots of politics in education. It gives a brief overview of the two main roots in political education. The lead isn't overly detailed. There isn't much content in the article aside from one paragraph that barely has references. This article doesn't address historically underrepresented populations or topics. The article does a good job at being very neutral, there is a tone and balance in the article. A lot of the sources and citations need to verified. Most of the sources work well and fully load but there's a couple that don't fully load. Even though there's not a lot of content in this article there is still a lot going on, it's not organized as it could be. There are no images on the article, it's filled with words and links, but no images. In the talk section, they are having conversations on how there's not much in the article to go off of and how all the citations seems very outdated. This article could improve if there were more than 2 paragraphs all together. One strength that this article has is the tone of the article and how it stayed neutral the whole way through. This article could be improved if the citations were updated and there were more subtopics because there is such more you could say relating to politics in education.