User:Odunn23/Carbon footprint/Istone2vu Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Odunn23


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Odunn23/Carbon footprint
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Carbon footprint

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

Guiding questions:

·       Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?

Yes

·       Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?

Yes it defines a carbon footprint and the average person’s footprint.

·       Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?

Yes but the edited section only includes the intro sentence.

·       Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?

No.

·       Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Concise.

Content

Guiding questions:

·       Is the content added relevant to the topic?

Yes

·       Is the content added up-to-date?

Yes, all sources from 2021.

·       Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

no.

·       Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

It represents a concept that not many people may be aware of that impacts the environment.

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

·       Is the content added neutral?

Yes

·       Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

No

·       Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

No

·       Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Attempts to explain to the reader changes that could be made in daily life that would reduce consumers' carbon footprint.

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

·       Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?

Yes all sources are reliable.

·       Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)

·       Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?

Yes

·       Are the sources current?

Yes all from 2021.

·       Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?

Yes

·       Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)

More statistics on how air travel or other carbon footprint reducing solutions are effective would be helpful and improve reliability.

·       Check a few links. Do they work?

Yes.

Organization

Guiding questions:

·       Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?

Yes

·       Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?

No

·       Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Yes

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

·       Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?

Yes

·       Are images well-captioned?

Yes, explains how air travel impacts carbon footprint.

·       Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?

Yes

·       Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Yes