User:Ogs004/Flores scops owl/Srthompson012 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Ogs004


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Flores scops owl

Evaluate the drafted changes
This article has a lot of room for growth. Right now, it does not look like much information was given on the Flores Scops Owl. It appears that there is only a brief introduction written on the current page. In this lead of the article, however, it is clear that the information was written well. There is a clear display of what animal is being discussed in the article, and helpful information, like the name and the endemism of the Owl is given. Something that could benefit the article would be to create a section that clearly labels "Introduction" or "Background," something that will give the reader a better idea of what section of the article they are reading. If more information is added to the lead, then I believe the information in the article has the potential to be quite balanced. There is still a lot of significant information that needs to be added, and with a work in progress that will always be the case. I presume that habitat loss and conservation will be main points in this article, which is great. It is important to have a focus that relates to current events. In addition, the content presented seems to be very neutral, with no bias at all. You have done a quality job of just implementing fact, and not opinion. Finally, your sources appear to be reliable. There is a clear scientific source, along with two other sources used for background on the naming and other basic information on the animal. This is a very solid beginning to the article, and I look forward to seeing future writing.