User:Ogwu94/Soil regeneration/Ironphd10 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) Ogwu94


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ogwu94/Soil_regeneration?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Soil regeneration

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I think this is a really great article! Very detailed and thorough with plenty of references that are current and up to date. The overall format looks like a wikipedia article and there are even images! To further improve this already great article, I would maybe add a lead section; basically summarizing everything you will discuss to introduce your topic. With this added, I would then maybe add more transition sentences at the beginning of each sentence to further increase the flow of the paper.

Going through the peer review template, the content, tone and balance, organization, and sources and references are great! The images are good and I am glad they are included. To further improve, I would maybe add more descriptive figure captions. Also, I don't know if this is just on my end but 3 of the images, don't show up for me.

Below I have also listed minor grammatical errors

I would change CO2 --> CO2 in the second paragraph.

"The use of cover crops, less tillage, crop rotation,compost making, and avoiding the use of synthetic fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides, are some starter practices ."

In this sentence above in the second paragraph, the last comma is grammatically incorrect, so I would remove.

In the third paragraph last sentence, the semi-colon should be removed. It is not a sentence if left in.

In the fourth paragraph second sentence, I would remove the word "works."

Unless these are someone's names or names of companies, I would uncapitalize: regenerative agriculture, nanoparticles, nanoremediation, nanoscience, brownian motion, conservation agrictulture (also you define this as CA, you can also just refer to as CA there after in that paragraph), green manuring, carbon, nitrogen, phosphorous, microbiota,

In the sixth paragraph, I think there is a typo: "sorbed." Thank you so much for the review. I corrected the typos that you highlighted and also effected the recommendations that you made on the article content, order and flow.